Outreach, payment plans, payment capture, bank-feed cash application, disputes, and analytics — with modelling that runs on your own history and shows its reasoning.
Published pricing. Integrate against your own stack with a documented REST API — no implementation partner, no rip-and-replace.
Every scheduled communication is inspectable before it executes. Preview the rendered content, edit it, reschedule it, pause it, cancel it — from a list or a calendar. Nothing reaches a customer that your team couldn't have seen and stopped.
Hi Dana,
Just a quick note that invoice INV-2841 for $4,820.00 is due this Friday. You can pay by card or bank transfer here:
View and pay invoice →
Thanks — Marcus
Coverage
Reminders, payment plans, payment capture, bank-feed cash application, dispute intake, analytics. Point tools cover one or two of these, and your team feels every seam between them — a separate contract, a separate admin model, a separate security review, and a reconciliation project every time someone asks what collection efficiency actually is.
The analysis a finance-analytics hire would do on your receivables, running continuously, on your own data, with its work shown. Every recommendation carries a confidence score, the data points behind it, the current and proposed values, and the reason.
An optional shared pattern pool exists — anonymised, bucketed signals only, never amounts, names, or message content. It is opt-in, reversible, and the contributor pool is still small, so treat it as upside rather than as the reason the modelling works. Everything above runs on your data alone.
Send the second reminder earlier
Across 214 of your own reminders, the ones sent on day 5 were answered noticeably sooner than the ones sent on day 7. Tuesday and Wednesday mornings did best.
Nothing changes until you apply it.
A Plaid bank feed lands in staged transactions, then each deposit is scored against candidate invoices on amount, date proximity, payer-name similarity and reference number. The thresholds are published, not proprietary.
The three things most often missing from a cadence tool, each measured rather than anecdotal.
The problem with vendor dashboards is rarely that they are wrong — it is that nobody can explain how they were computed. Every figure above ships with its computation.
Integration
You are not going to move your ledger to suit a collections tool, and we would not ask. ARPilot sits on top of the system you already run: a documented REST API with an OpenAPI schema, scoped keys, and webhooks emitted by database triggers rather than by application code someone has to remember to instrument. Teams running NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Dynamics or SAP integrate through that surface; the ingestion core is source-agnostic with per-source adapters. QuickBooks Online has a native bidirectional connector today, and it is one supported path rather than the required one.
Model it on your own numbers
Your numbers, our arithmetic, every assumption visible and editable.
Assumption — adjust to your team.
Assumption — adjust to your team.
Nothing you type here leaves your browser.
Cash released per 5 days of DSO improvement
$548K
These are estimates computed from the inputs and assumptions above. They describe the size of the opportunity in your own numbers — they are not a forecast of results with ARPilot, and we do not publish outcome percentages we cannot source.
Controls
Row-level security in PostgreSQL. Application-layer checks exist for user experience; the database is the boundary that matters.
AES-256 via pgcrypto, with the passphrase held in a managed vault rather than in application config or environment variables.
Only through an impersonation path that is read-only and written to an audit trail.
Yes, including enforced MFA on privileged actions rather than MFA as an account-level preference.
It can send what your team scheduled — that's the automation you're buying. It cannot change your workflows, templates, or cadence on its own: those recommendations stay pending until an operator applies them. And every scheduled action is visible, editable, and cancellable before it runs.
A do-not-contact list and a consent audit log, with recordings tracked against consent.
Not yet. We describe controls, not certifications, and we won't claim a report we don't have. If a completed SOC 2 is a gate for you, say so in the first call.
You can model the cost before you talk to anyone.
For a finance team running collections as a process, with the API surface to feed your warehouse and BI.
$3,000/year — about 2 months free
Unlimited volume with an SLA, custom integrations, and dedicated support. Priced per engagement.
Annual billing works out cheaper. Stripe processing is standard pass-through.
A demo runs about thirty minutes. Bring a current aging export and we'll walk the action hub, the matching thresholds, and what the model says about your book.